One of the complications inherent in presenting a blog such as this, concerns terminology. What we can refer to as “metaphysical” concepts are not always clear or straightforward – by their very nature. And to complicate that even more, the added implication of what those terms or concepts already may have as definitions, or associations. How many definitions does the word love have? What about spirit? Each of us may have their own idea in response to the terms used in this blog.
Throughout most of the transmissions that I have received, there has been the use of terminology that has avoided many of these, I will term them, overused words. Not that they are wrong, only that the baggage that they carry with them can become confusing, and at times point in directions that a mind may think it comprehends. Which definition of love do we use today?
For example, etheric is an old term, which has a kind of nebulous feeling to it. For me, it implies a more transcendental state of being, or an energy aspect of our being. Something that transcends our physical body and awareness. In other words, purposely vague, so that the mind has little to attach itself. It implies a concept direction, but does not attempt to define what that direction is. It acts as a placeholder in effect, to be expanded upon within the overall context being discussed. Thus keeping me from jumping back into preconceived notions.
Another consideration is that much of what this blog is about concerns multiple layers of creation, of consciousness. We term it dimensions or dimensional densities. I will explore this term in greater detail a bit later, but for now consider it a reference to multiple states of conscious experiences. Each having their own sets of guidelines, capabilities that provide the framework, the background for an individual conscious being, beings, to function within. We also referred to it as the creation matrix, One of many, or perhaps one of an infinite number available. And to complicate this concept even more, is the use of the term multi-verse, which is being used in scientific circles. It brings its own potential definitions into this mixture. Personally, I have been inclined to stay away from that term /concept at this time.
These terms, these concepts are incredibly complex. And just referencing them by name has made it apparent that a glossary of terms, and / or a commentary addition to the individual postings, is necessary. And these may, or may not conform to of the recognizable definitions. All I am able to present are the explanations that my guides provide. Or the extent of my understanding to date. And similar to a scientific hypothesis process, I recognize there may be an evolutionary process in searching for accurate definitions. And one that reflects a more specific essence contained within the transmission itself. The context.
Hopefully, bite sized chunks to wrap our heads around. A.S. 4/18/21
